The
controversy over the failure of Muhammadu Buhari to make public his
educational qualification has been turned into an issue but the general
and his party affirm that they would not dignify what they claim is a
non issue.
By Emmanuel Aziken, Political Editor & Dapo Akinrefon
It
all started just over a week ago when the Independent National
Electoral Commission,
INEC, in the course of its statutory obligations
published the details of the presidential candidates and in the place of
the educational qualification of Gen. Muhammadu Buhari listed an
affidavit.
Buhari, the All Progressives Congress, APC presidential candidate had in the affidavit deposed thus:
“I
am the above-named person and deponent to this affidavit therein. All
my academic qualifications documents as filled in my presidential form,
President APC/001/2015, are currently with the Secretary, Military Board
as of the time of presenting this affidavit. The affidavit is made in
good faith and for record purpose.”
The use of an affidavit in the
place of a certificate had immediately roused suspicion from the
general’s political rivals who sought to use the issue to rake mud
against a candidate that is making his boldest challenge for the
country’s presidency.
Educational qualifications
Given the
sterling educational qualifications of his chief rival, President
Goodluck Jonathan who holds a doctorate degree in zoology, it was
tempting for some to make a big issue of the alleged failure of the APC
candidate to produce a certificate. Or was there a doubt as to the claim
that Buhari, acclaimed to have been head boy at the famous Katsina
College and who subsequently attended some of the world’s best military
institutions did not have any certificate to show for his endeavours?
The
issue was not helped by the seemingly lacklustre response of the Buhari
campaign to the issue. Questions put to campaign officials were
deflected as one spokesman told Vanguard to make enquiries to the
military board to which Buhari claimed to be in possession of the
certificate.
Military officials who initially denied possession of
the certificate were to later admit having copies of the former head of
state’s credentials as they did for every other retired and serving
military official. Sources close to the candidate say that the originals
of his certificates were vandalised after the time he was removed as
head of state and that the only copies available at the moment are those
with the military board.
Remarkably,
investigations revealed that Buhari had in the last three presidential
contests he partook in, 2003, 2007 and 2011, had consistently used
affidavits in the place of the certificates. How the issue became
topical this time around in the opinion of some stakeholders is
essentially because of the good prospects Buhari has in next month’s
presidential election.
Remarkably, the PDP has officially not
entered the fray but it is not as if sympathisers of the party and its
chieftains are not trying to make a kill on the issue they believe could
jeopardise the chances of the greatest threat to the party’s domination
of the federal government.
Remarkably, a close aide of Buhari
laughed away the matter saying that the campaign would not waste time or
energy to go down to the mud with its traducers. A member of the APC
presidential screening committee, Dr. Tunji Abayomi, brought another
twist to the development in his own response to the issue. Abayomi, a
lawyer affirmed that Buhari was screened and found qualified for the
office of the president.
He nevertheless brought a twist when he
affirmed that the issue of the submission of a certificate was not an
issue. His assertion was in line with that of INEC which said that it
did not have the powers to screen or disqualify a candidate on the basis
of qualification.
In affirming that Buhari was screened and met
the qualifications for president, Abayomi had put the poser as to
whether presenting “his school certificate or its equivalent met the
education precondition set for Presidential Candidates in the
Constitution?”
He answered thus: “To begin with, the Constitution
does not prescribe the presentation or show of any Certificate to
qualify for election to the office of President. Under section 131(d) of
our Military Constitution, a person shall be qualified for election to
the office of President if “he has been educated up to at least School
Certificate level or its equivalent.” While a Certificate may
unequivocally show that a contestant has been educated up to at least
School Certificate level, his education without a Certificate may show,
again unequivocally that he has been educated up to the equivalent of
School Certificate level. For example, assuming A is the best all A
student in Ajuwa Grammar School, Okeagbe, Akoko. Now on the very day
before the commencement of the West African School Certificate, he
sexually harassed the daughter of the English teacher as a result of
which he was dismissed, will A be said not to have met the education
qualification of section 131(d) of the Constitution?”
“In my view A
has not only been educated up to at least School Certificate level he
would also be deemed to have been educated to its equivalent.
This
position finds support in section 131 (d) which neither prescribed a
pass which is required for certification nor a fail which denies it. The
interest of the Constitution is with the level of the education of the
candidate howsoever acquired, not the certificate he acquires ipso
facto.
“The APC screening Committee was made up of several eminent
highly educated and enlightened men and one woman. They came to the
conclusion after putting APC presidential aspirants through a most
rigorous test that all the APC aspirants met the constitutional
qualifications including education qualification to contest for election
to the office of President. They confirmed this by awarding them a
certificate. The qualification set by the Constitution for contest is
the level of education not its certificate. While a certificate may
irrevocably prove that the education qualification has been met, it
could in the same manner prove rebut ably only that it has been met.
Possession of a certificate
“Where
for example a Certificate has been purchased for example in “oluwole”
as it has happened in several instances, a candidate though in
possession of a certificate cannot be said to have met the education
qualification of the Constitution because he has not been educated not
to talk of up to school certificate level.”
“With reference to
General Buhari having regard to his unimpeachable military training, an
irrefutable presumption was properly made by the APC screening Committee
that he met the education qualification set by the Constitution. Those
who contest this or who intend to contest that he met the education
qualification of section 131(d) have the burden to disprove the
irrefutable presumption not General Buhari.”
No comments:
Post a Comment